![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/571212/small_1694751592-avatar-rogerg10.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 February 2023 | 3 replies
He couldn't remember the legal term for it but apparently it was something fairly recent out of the state supreme court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/180315/small_1621422681-avatar-bbrownsbp.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 March 2014 | 17 replies
You may think it requires some sort of supreme expertise which may be true if there were different circumstances but the only hurdle I had to overcome was securing a new buyer.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1037341/small_1621507895-avatar-mirandas6.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 November 2018 | 106 replies
So the overlord supreme of the Google SERPs (search results) decided to pass judgment!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1301144/small_1696438406-avatar-rbradycr7homes.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 March 2023 | 83 replies
We have had a black president, black VP, multiple minorities on the supreme court (probably not enough but possibly in line with the percentage of minorities that pass the bar).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2655372/small_1694638958-avatar-christophers917.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 April 2023 | 15 replies
Whether we’re vindicated at the trial court, the court of appeals or the Ohio Supreme Court, basically we’re in this for the long run and I assume that the city is too,” Mr.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/25023/small_1621363092-avatar-realtyman.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
13 October 2012 | 9 replies
This trend of successfully defending the right of Realtor associations to restrict MLS access to members was interrupted in 1977 and 1978 when two California courts held it to be a violation of the Cartwright Act (the California antitrust statute) for Realtor® associations to exclude non-members from a Realtor® association MLS.3 In contrast, the Supreme Courts of Iowa and New Jersey subsequently held that the membership rule did not violate the antitrust laws of those states.43.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1197384/small_1669231246-avatar-ethicalwholesal.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 February 2021 | 18 replies
Hot take supreme.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/869727/small_1694575359-avatar-chadw58.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 December 2017 | 5 replies
Unfortunately, a 2010 Florida Supreme Court case (Olmstead v.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2221204/small_1695038274-avatar-nickolasr5.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 March 2022 | 2 replies
@Nickolas Rakovsky, I'm not a supreme expert on STR's but since no one has responded to this yet I'll give you couple things I've figured out on my fairly recent attempt at STR's.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/791122/small_1621497489-avatar-chrisagodbolt.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 April 2018 | 26 replies
For what may be good for one may be bad to someone else. 32 states voted to make marriage ONLY for a man and a woman, and yet it was over turned by the Supreme Court.