For instance, and in brief only using one concept (not meant to be the full list of criteria), a rural property has a population restrictions and proximity to Metropolitan Service Areas ("MSA" - think big city area) as some restrictions.

The population isn't as high but you will be riding the appreciation and target those who want to be close to the major city.

These can bring in significantly higher revenue compared to long-term rentals, especially during peak travel seasons​.Single-Family Rentals in Growth Markets:Target neighborhoods with growing populations, good schools, and job opportunities.

Additionally, the amendment might encourage local governments to raise sales taxes to offset the lost property tax revenue, spreading the tax burden to a broader population, including those who do not own homes [4].Broader Context and AlternativesGeorgia already has multiple state homestead exemptions in place, including the Standard Homestead Exemption, age-based exemptions, and exemptions for disabled veterans.

With the population in Texas predicted to double by the year 2050, it is a good place to invest. 

However, the DFW area stands out due to its stronger appreciation, rapid population growth, and overall economic expansion.

Focus on cities with favorable price-to-rent ratios, population growth, and employment trends, such as Des Moines, Oklahoma City, and Charlotte, while considering factors like landlord-friendliness and property taxes.

Look at all the population growth, job growth, and companies moving/developing here - it's absolutely blowing up and Columbus is one of the hottest markets in the entire US. 

The result is outward population migration and rising crime.

Does focusing on macro trends (Population growth, rental and appreciation growth, good jobs) offset the 1% rule?