at 7 deals falling apart I think you have to face you have a flawed model and/or are off base about what constitutes a real problem. 

But the liberal legislators like to camouflage this constitutional taking by appealing to the emotions of the public by using the term "eviction." 

Some terms you may find helpful:Repayment Schedule: Clearly outline the payment schedule (monthly, quarterly, etc.).Balloon Payment: If applicable, specify the amount and due date of any balloon payment.Prepayment Penalty: State if there’s a penalty for paying off the loan early.Default Terms: Clearly define what constitutes a default and the consequences, such as foreclosure procedures.Insurance Requirements: Ensure the buyer maintains property insurance.Maintenance Responsibilities: Clarify that the buyer is responsible for property maintenance and repairs.I hope this helps you out, have a great day!

(This requirement may be waived under certain special circumstances constituting good cause for a waiver, such as the loan being issued because of a bona fide emergency, with the lender obtaining written consent from the buyer to proceed with the loan without the disclosure notice.)The closing on a home equity loan must occur at a permanent office of the lender, at a title company, or at the offices of a lawyer.After the closing occurs, the borrower has a three day period during which the borrower may cancel the loan without having to pay any charge or penalty.

Does a dead lawn due to lack of watering in addition to the lack of basic property security and reckless waste of utilities (AC and lights) constitute negligence/breach of duty on the property manager's part?

Can someone tell me if this is correct: if the owner redeems they have to pay the full bid price, fees and court costs, 10% interest, and any “necessary” repairs (what constitutes that)?

I found this info online:Circumstances that allow you to avoid having to produce documents or appear in court may include the following:Claims that the information sought is privilegedIf you lost or no longer have the informationThe produce or appearance violates your Fifth Amendment constitutional right against self-incriminationThe request is overly broadThe request is unduly burdensome 

* I am not familiar with Baltimore or what would constitute a complaint This is something that I've seen happen in New York with neighbors who are unhappy with tenants or owners on their street.

And under that definition, because there was no minimum time in the CZO for how long someone needed to occupy a structure to be considered "living" there, the court used literal dictionary definitions (standard practice in NH as can be seen in the similar case Working Stiff Partners v City of Portsmouth) to determine what constituted "living as a household" as it concerns STRs.The court explicity rejected the idea that this ruling should have larger implications for STRs around the state, and it certainly did not at all in any way prevent municipalities from regulating STRs.

Having a google voice number and littering some stupid and ugly signs on telephone poles does not constitute starting a business.