data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05e6b/05e6bde9cdc80daf4f08387855140c06b24b1ba8" alt=""
12 February 2025 | 0 replies
What was the outcome?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df3d/3df3d72392f038a4882e5002ebd75397ee720609" alt=""
17 February 2025 | 0 replies
What was the outcome?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8349d/8349d60b7a17b07aabcdbf9587f4eedf048fb4bf" alt=""
14 February 2025 | 5 replies
The IRS could apply this doctrine if it appears that the series of transactions are structured primarily to achieve a specific tax outcome, such as avoiding taxes.Regarding the 1031 exchange, while in-laws are not considered related parties, the transaction could still be scrutinized due to the complexity and nature of the other transactions involved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb7d1/eb7d17be405c62c3cdd84c0c1afcb96b961d5b19" alt=""
24 February 2025 | 9 replies
I've done these for 5 years now and the fund gets audited every time - knock on wood the outcomes continue to be favorable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29e1b/29e1bc2c05a90533b555ad013ba064aba8eba931" alt=""
13 February 2025 | 5 replies
What was the outcome?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0afcb/0afcb307e0f87326a3d9203724c849b908e6f558" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 1 reply
What was the outcome?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df3d/3df3d72392f038a4882e5002ebd75397ee720609" alt=""
17 February 2025 | 0 replies
What was the outcome?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41be9/41be9b4accd9fb135172c089d3ccc1b77926c474" alt=""
24 February 2025 | 6 replies
With those high rates, I am curious on outcomes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/737a0/737a0787114bbcbc3d3f5eb71e417ea1946c9e06" alt=""
18 February 2025 | 2 replies
Whooping $815 more cash-flow What was the outcome?