In other words, I'm not aware of a definitive prohibition against it, but am aware of various theories on why it could be considered abusive y the IRS.

I have been selling many of my rental properties (many with long term tenants in place) to knowledgeable local investors (owner occupancy is prohibited--no Dodd-Frank/SAFE Act concerns) on land contract.

There is going to be an increased amount of paperwork Holton-Wise must perform on your behalf while working with CMHA.Holton-Wise will need to physically appear at CMHA's office multiple times.Holton-Wise will need to coordinate one or possibly more inspections at the rental property with CMHA's inspectors to ensure is is compliant with their regulations.If / when CMHA determines that the property has a violation that needs to be corrected to adhere to their standards Holton-Wise is given a very short window to correct it which means Holton-Wise must give you priority scheduling over all of Holton-Wise's other clients and Holton-Wise may even need to do this multiple times as sometimes tenant's exit the voucher program and or move onto something else while Holton-Wise is going through this inspection process with CMHA.It typically takes anywhere from 30 days to 60 days from the time Holton-Wise approves a tenant's rental application until the time that CMHA approves the rental property for tenancy on the Section 8 program.CMHA prohibits Holton-Wise from passing on some of your rental unit leasing costs to the tenants like Holton-Wise does with normal cash paying tenants.Q.

Good luckCheck this out CA SB 897 It was signed by the governor Sept, 28, 2022 Dealing With Unpermitted WorkMany cities currently prohibit homeowners from developing ADUs if there is unpermitted work on their property.

So a sponsor that's great for one investor will probably be terrible for another (and vice versa).I'm a conservative investor, so when I invest in multi-family I prefer sponsors that have at least one full real-estate cycle of experience, little to no money lost, low leverage, and high skin in the game.And there is an apartment operator that has multiple real estate cycles of experience (decades) with no money lost, low 65% less LTV, and high 10%+ skin in the game.They market under 506B so are prohibited from posting publicly on the Internet and instead function by referrals.

Exemption (C), on the other hand, permits the sale of securities to an unlimited number of accredited investors but prohibits the inclusion of any non-accredited investors. 

Interests of Foreign Countries; Prohibiting governmental entities from knowingly entering into certain contracts; authorizing the Attorney General to bring a civil action; providing penalties; requiring government entities to require an affidavit from applicants before providing any economic incentive; prohibiting foreign principals from purchasing agricultural land, or having more than a de minimus indirect interest in such land, and certain real property in this state, respectively; authorizing foreign principals to continue to own or hold such land or property under certain circumstances, etc.We'll see where this goes...lots of discussions....I've really only heard 4 countries talked about China, North Korea, Cuba, Iran....and probably limiting that to agricultural purchases.Not sure how many North Koreans are buying agricultural land, but Chinese have (6666 Ranch in Texas supposedly), Saudi has in AZ. 

We obtain credit reports direct from Equifax, but are prohibited from sharing those in any manner with the applicant or anyone outside of the transaction, essentially.

I tried to include his contact details but it looks like that's prohibited.

Hi, just to clarify, real estate closing requirements vary by state law, a Jackie points out, but there is no state that prohibits and attorney from closing a real estate transaction.