I'm looking to exchange a multi-use property I own in the Bay Area for a multifamily property in Phoenix (looking at 15-19 units).

The current monthly payments from all units will remain constant for 35 years, but obviously the value of those payments will be worth far less 35 years from now due to inflation.

We’re breaking ground on projects like 12-200 unit townhomes, apartments, and other developments, filling a gap for affordable housing where it’s needed but overlooked.

Many opt for other investing methods in their SDIRA like private lending, crypto, private equity...anything except collectibles and life insurance.Note that a Solo 401k is exempt from UBIT on leveraged real estate so if you have self employment activity and no full time employees save for you and your spouse you should consider the Solo K as an option. 

With both programs you can buy 1-4 units as long as you occupy 1 of the units. 

We teach you how to self-manage and support you with loads of contacts for your team in each market. 

Called a few Foremost agents in NYC and either no pickup or don't do over 3 units. :( :( 

Hello need suggestions/advice...own a business with property...Land next door was approved for Mixed Use Construction (Retail on bottom residential on top)..Construction has begunMy business is slow and is affecting bottom line..may need to relocate business and have developer build on my property...Would like to keep property and build same as next door(numbers will be easy to get including approvals) ...looking for investor ..Afterbuild units can be sold or rented...For exist plan total improvements $2.3+MPlease let me know thoughts....suggestions time sensitive..Thank you

Quote from @Daniel Windingstad: Quote from @Obed Calixte: Some people have the personality, processes and systems & time to self manage, some do not.

Quote from @Devin James: In one of our development projects, the City staff asked us to remove 40 units from our concept plan.This wasn’t requested by the City Commission at a formal hearing, it was the opinion of the staff.Our original concept already proposed fewer units than the current zoning would have allowed.Here’s what erasing 40 units means:- 40 fewer homes for buyers- Over $1M in lost profit for our team- Fewer tax dollars and impact fees that could’ve benefited the City’s infrastructure & servicesWe gotta get betterEveryone wants more affordable housing, but not everyone wants to do what it takes to achieve it we never listen to the recommending bodies. we move for city approvals and work closely. the other thing we do is keep going back to the same groups over and over and over and over every month on the same agenda and make very small reductions like 2% or 4% and that reduces and beats them down eventually they accept what you want. it's just before beating a dead horse. we keep tabling until they give us something we all agree on then we go to vote. in our city in columbus we have to get recommendations but that's our strategy. we used to come out as aggressive as possible. we typically study developments in the area and keep it very similar in terms of density. we have a track record of very controversial projects and litigation and not taking no as an answer. after a year of that haha I can tell you it's not worth it. now we are more relationship based and buying the right kinds of plots of land. if the numbers don't work on the front end don't do the development.