For the original acquisition, I was able to solely guarantee the loan and keep my LPs off title and the note (as it should be).

I would say investing along with the LPs is even better.And the asset class depends on your preference.

LPs seem to make sense for me by allowing me to attract higher sale price and rent from buyers who may not have all their down payment and/or credit to buy a home in a little nicer area. 

In the case of multifamily syndication, the private investors are Limited Partners in the deal which means they funds raised by them to close the deal are not considered borrowed because the LPs are partners in the deal. 

Though this topic gets more emphasis than other more important ones, it does show that the sponsor will fight hard for the success of the property knowing that their own capital is at risk alongside the LPs. 

More people are working from home stimulating companies gross income and cutting down cost.

My gut is telling me that this cannot be done considering all of the shares are "purchased" and split accordingly with the GPs and LPs at the time of the assets closing, meaning there are no open shares for future purchase.

In the latter case, the per annum distributions will be reduced if there is any Return of Capital event.Let's look at some numbers to explore this difference.Say I invest $100,000 in a deal with a 7% Preferred Return after which there is a 70/30 split between LPs and Sponsors.

Because of the lower inventory that's stimulating this raise in home values, rents in Sacramento are surging to higher and higher prices.

I don't know if you can apply for them anymore as the Governor funded a program to stimulate 14 different, private, insurance companies to start up Homeowner's Insurance in Florida to get us off of the State run company of last resort.