
17 May 2020 | 8 replies
@Troy Winkler Hi Troy.In light of the daily situation of shelter in place orders and people in fear of contact from social distancing, we came up with a fast solution to showing vacant, or even occupied units to get them back into rent-collecting inventory.

3 April 2020 | 7 replies
That's sort of like a sign that says "Free Beer and Food" and all you get is one Natural Light and a Slim Jim.

1 April 2020 | 2 replies
A "light" fixer upper which wound up needing more than expected (as we should have expected).

3 April 2020 | 27 replies
However, at this time, ensuring that the portfolios are strongly positioned to weather even the most severe downturn is the prudent decision.We are aware of the fact that this may be a difficult time for some of our investors and want to reiterate that this was not a decision we have taken lightly.

4 April 2020 | 3 replies
I thought the hot black got connected to the light and the white thats next to it, got connected with the blacks, while the other 2 whites connect to the light.

3 April 2020 | 2 replies
Plan to pay cash ($600K purchase price) and do some relatively light rehab. 2 units need a new kitchen and a new bathroom.

16 February 2022 | 27 replies
My parallel point to warning other investors with your analysis is to warn you -- I think you are headed for a rude awakening at some point.

23 March 2021 | 50 replies
Again, we open all projects to the studs to provide the best finished product, and ensure no safety/code issues upon completion.(3) All costmetics is very broad; however, if you're talking paint, flooring, trim, lighting, door knobs, etc, this will be a very big number.

2 April 2020 | 7 replies
(assuming they acted correctly in the eyes of the law)A police report was obtained, and it did shed a very narrow beam of light on the manner.

2 April 2020 | 3 replies
I’d note that the excess contribution and the penalty thereon continue every year into perpetuity until the excess contribution is pulled out or slowly converted to a regular contribution at the rate of $5,500 ($6,500 if IRA owner is 50+ years old) per year.In light of this case, I think that the Court would certainly view an IRA with the described assignment deal as “not at risk” – all it has in the deal is $100.