To me, the only additional value to a seller financed offer would be the savings, or part of, that would be realized if the seller gave you a below market rate (ie the savings from say a 3% seller financed rate vs a 5% market rate)

I suspect that this asset-size offers more opportunity as there are likely more operating inefficiencies.If comparable properties in this market trade at a 10% cap, would it be unrealistic to shoot for an acquisition with, let’s say, a 14% cap?

If BP could provide a pay per view webinar with a teacher(s) who can instruct in fine line detail, with a real transaction as a sample, answer questions, and possibly even provide photo and video clips of exactly how to do a specific deal using a specific strategy, would that be worth say a $59 affordable cost?

Passive does not have to mean fully hands off, but let's say a few hours/week on average at most.I am asking for ideas, but I should mention up front the things I am just not interested in for this goal.

Let's say a property with market value of $175k with loan amount of $120k.

I'd say a lot (maybe even most) of SMF landlords cover garbage and landscaping as well.I think those were the big things that I saw, otherwise seems like a pretty great opportunity! 

Difficult to say as each project will be different.

Say a tenant pays on January 1 for the entire year.

ExampleLet’s say a deal starts out with a 70/30 split until the investors hit a 10% annual return.

Say a property has a PITI of $1,200.