data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce800/ce800dcfaa172c69b0356eafa15a7839451acb1f" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 10 replies
Quote from @Devin James: In one of our development projects, the City staff asked us to remove 40 units from our concept plan.This wasn’t requested by the City Commission at a formal hearing, it was the opinion of the staff.Our original concept already proposed fewer units than the current zoning would have allowed.Here’s what erasing 40 units means:- 40 fewer homes for buyers- Over $1M in lost profit for our team- Fewer tax dollars and impact fees that could’ve benefited the City’s infrastructure & servicesWe gotta get betterEveryone wants more affordable housing, but not everyone wants to do what it takes to achieve it we never listen to the recommending bodies. we move for city approvals and work closely. the other thing we do is keep going back to the same groups over and over and over and over every month on the same agenda and make very small reductions like 2% or 4% and that reduces and beats them down eventually they accept what you want. it's just before beating a dead horse. we keep tabling until they give us something we all agree on then we go to vote. in our city in columbus we have to get recommendations but that's our strategy. we used to come out as aggressive as possible. we typically study developments in the area and keep it very similar in terms of density. we have a track record of very controversial projects and litigation and not taking no as an answer. after a year of that haha I can tell you it's not worth it. now we are more relationship based and buying the right kinds of plots of land. if the numbers don't work on the front end don't do the development.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fc1f/4fc1fa953251eea3fee5430df81172e5161fc92c" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 8 replies
The fact that you have a TAX-FREE income is crazy good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ac8/a1ac8dfdace4940edfe26c097534e467820112ad" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 18 replies
Someone can be a brilliant tax person but horrible to work with, and also vice versa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da5e2/da5e237ca21738330192e56e1ecc9d8e7eca4f3a" alt=""
28 January 2025 | 11 replies
Yes, do the tax exchange if you can.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82c94/82c94d5e45875237f8c82023f4dbfed92794eb64" alt=""
14 February 2025 | 12 replies
Sometimes hard to find this happy medium in rate sheets, though.Another consideration would be taxes - points are typically treated as interest, so if your tax obligations are high this year vs being higher in the future, then this could also impact buying down now vs paying a little more in interest in future years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51b8c/51b8c897c9f4a182b10cb62e25190c7e8f625bbf" alt=""
20 January 2025 | 62 replies
The final rate that was offered to you was 6.5% at a 30 year fix.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f2f/17f2ff5085b829fe533e8bc7fe535ee1ff1efee4" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 18 replies
other posters have started threads saying they're going to buy STRs for tax savings... and this doesn't make sense to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7ef7/d7ef7a9be3342a0b037240cb5e130cccf7f11a45" alt=""
28 January 2025 | 4 replies
On your tax return you would report the proceeds, subtract costs and proceeds paid to seller, then the remaining profit would be your flat fee.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e7fc/6e7fcc0f3149ea5405408846ec60dbdba7f5bf74" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 5 replies
Conventional lending requires tax returns, good FICO and reasonable DTI.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/611bc/611bc87748459bf1016394b508827427c4332267" alt=""
2 February 2025 | 4 replies
Since the trust is a disregarded entity, the benefit is bypassing probate, not tax issues or liability concerns.