Point being that property you acquire 1-2 years ago is likely to be subject to deferred maintenance and capex, so their "long term" performance in rankings 1), 3) might skew poorly in year 1-2 but may pickup  after you've found and fixed all the hidden issues.I know if i did this exercise across my portfolio, the recently acquired ones wouldn't be fairly "stacked" because of all the year 1-2 cost build up from what the seller deferred, but have good chances at being future performers in years 3-5.Maybe that's why you have 2) and 5) but curious your general thoughts here are for evaluating this. 

I have a lot of ideas on how to buy real estate with no money (Novation, Subject To, owner financed), to partner with someone who has money, and/or to buy for yourself with money. 

A HOT Latina image in the ad. :) 

You're buying a specific property, in a specific location, in a specific condition, subject to local rules and regulations.

Seller financing and “Subject To” are other financing options to explore. 

In those cases, the main criteria we add to our lease is that everyone that comes to stay there must be subject to a background check paid by the company.

If USPS is slow, tenant is subject to late fees and even eviction.

Stay with properties at or below median value within 1/2 mile maximum of the subject property.  

You'll have depreciation shielding your passive income, so that's a 35% savings on your marginal income. however if you flip you'll be subject to higher tax rate - so you'll have to figure out what strategy works best for you.

Interest Income: The interest income generated from owner financing is considered passive income and is not subject to UBTI (Unrelated Business Taxable Income).3.