I specifically put you in there because I've heard your the direct mail expert, so no harm in promoting the company.

Let him know you meant no harm which you probably did convey that.  

You can accomplish the same thing with a TIC arrangement for years and using the estate planning tools keeps the investor out of harm's way much better than a Sub-To deal.So Brian, you want the docs, well, this project has been off and on for several years actually, we haven't discussed TICs in depth on BP before because I needed to brush off the tactics to ensure compliance with all the changes that have come about in real estate the past few years.

If the seller is happy with $45K and a fast sale, as opposed to a six month battle with selling it, is there any harm in that? 

Originally posted by @David Hines:Originally posted by @Michael Quarles:If someone believes that buying low and selling higher without performing improvements is unethical and that the buyer is harming the sellers then that person doesn't understand the value of liquidity and convenience.People often ask why a seller would sell me their home for 260,000 when I tell them and prove it to them with both a BPO and Appraisal its is worth 400,000 .

What's the harm in having one exclusive buyer that I bring all my deals too?

@Breshawn Hawthorne Despite the lack of harm to the seller, do you find no ethical dilemma in misleading a seller?