I'd argue the rich will most likely get hurt the least because the burden on them is a much smaller percentage of their net worth.  

I would argue that is much easier to complete using a primary residence as with investments there are more moving parts. 

Otherwise, you could also argue that you have to accept rapists or murderers, because very likely,  they have underlying psychological disorders that "made them do those things".

And the government (The Fed and White House) can't allow there to be a clear cut recession (which one could easily argue we're in right now) with an election looming in November.

I'd argue that statement is not true.  

If I was in that niche I would focus all of my efforts on getting deals under contract and have a great realtor on my team doing all the selling (assuming they could handle the volume).I would argue that buy and hold is the most advantageous to both, considering it costs an investor 0$ to buy with a realtor and if business is consistent then you can usually work out a deal for having some costs covered. 

Many times it is used in a religious context and one could argue that real estate is a religion and the gurus are the many varied ministers asking for contributions to their "ministries" lol.  

I'm not able to give you any good advice based on experience, but I just read Frank Gallinellis book "what every investor needs to know about cashflow" and Ken McElroys book "ABCs of real estate investing" both have great info on what to look out for in multi unit property's.

Lol, never mind, no sense in arguing with people who can't grasp something this simple.

Rich Dad Poor DadRich Dads Cash Flow QuadrantRich Dads Increase your financial IQThe Real Book of Real EstateThe ABC’s of RE InvestingThe ABC’s of PMRich Dad RE Tax AdvantagesThe 10X RuleThe E-MythThe 4 Hour Work WeekBiggerPocketsPodCast -I hear #136 is exceptional!