We have a moral obligation to care for those in need and I treat my tenants very well, but can I carry their burdens, no.

I want to give all the flexibility in the world but if it comes down to my having to pay my lenders (who I have a moral obligation to pay back as they put their trust in me with their capital), and my staff (who run my business, without them I'm dead), *OR* pay a tenants rent for them? 

@Robin Morales In my business, most people seemed to have backed out of their trades.

Moral, there are things that tenants don't notice that you might.  

They haven't done that to any other business owners, large or small; I don't see how that's lawful or moral/ethical.

I also want to echo the moral imperative to keep people housed during this pandemic.

We aren’t dealing in moral agreements here.

Before this thread spins out of control into opining on the relative merits of various forms of government and moral outrage at "people today". 

We can confirm with them if that is really how they'd like to proceed, but we should not have any moral obligation to stop them from making that decision.  

@Angelica Morales I agree with 100% of what @Randy Bloch stated above with one possible exception.If the IRA has enough in bonds (or other asset classes that have not fallen as much) and you wanted to distribute that to start RE investing it could still be a good move.