It isn't worded that harsh, but the point is made.

Fourth, I’m probably being a little harsh in my use of the term “junker” to generally describe functionally obsolete, non-liquid properties.

ok, so the scammer thing is a bit harsh.

@Taylor Shields Wow, a little harsh.

@Lucas A DavidsonI’m from a harsh winter area.

Either by your fiancée or one of the children.Sorry if this sounds harsh @Chris Edgell but this is an example of being stuck with the default estate plan provided under the law.It's about having clear title to transfer the property.When things are squared away perhaps the both of you could consult an estate attorney in regards to a Transfer-On-Death (TOD) Deed.

The fines are quite harsh so I would be sure to do it legally.   

If you don't communicate clearly, you'll never excel in your business.Again, sorry if that's harsh, but it is the truth.

Ugh- the harsh reality of trial and error!

Well the number 1 most important thing to have is a sense of humour.I didn't mean to be harsh in my last comment but sometimes just because you ask the question in a variety of ways, as you've done on other posts, it doesn't change the answer.I'm hoping you get more responses to this thread so you might feel you have a more balanced response if it seems biased to you.In the meantime, learn as much as you can and best of luck in finding a place that will fit within your parameters.