I do not have a particular bias toward leaders of the past.

And while you may feel that you're unbiased, you may be inherently biased.

Then again, I am an agent so I am a little biased!

I find that it is hardest on female investors because I have heard from and been the bearer of many contractors treating me like a total idiot...because of my gender.

My wife and I argue about gender roles all the time.

@Kurt Charles  Of course I am 100% bias in this as I have been a agent at 18 broker and 20 and have done this all my life.. then a NMLS licensed mortgage banker so I could legally lend money.. so getting licensed is in my nature.

So you cant accuse me of being biased in my analysis. 

Again, microeconomics has nothing to do with politics that you keep trying to make it, you seem to have some real bias here, because you keep pushing this notion that liberalism drives wealth despite all evidence to the contrary, it doesn't, you're just cherry picking data to fit your belief, while not understanding the most basic things they teach in an undergraduate level economics class. 

That said I'm not bias, I just don't see it.

This moral dilemma mentality is a dangerous slippery slope that leads to extremely biased and unfair regulations like we now have in Portland,  where if I need to have a tenant leave my person property so I can do an extensive remodel of the unit, (or because I have just had it with a bad tenant),   I have to give them 90 days notice and pay them $3500 "moving assistance".