The way I see it is that the monthly fee should cover coordinating routine maintenance (HVAC tuneup or minor maintenance, leaky faucets and drains, sprinklers, minor pest control, etc.), but larger ticket items that may require multiple bids, permits, or otherwise could have reasonably been prevented should be handled separately and charged to the owner.

This could work out in the higher cash-flow markets here in Ohio, such as Dayton. 

I’m just a young fella trying to work out SEO so here I am about to post my website link.

I know that probably wouldn't work out and may not even be worth my time since it can be so hard to prove.

If one deal doesn't work out, another deal makes up for it.

Generally any hold of more than a year is considered routinely safe.

Took a lot of the guess work out of it and we did well.

If you buy three things and work the same hardness on all of them, two work out and one is a loss you've worked three times as hard to get one win.

I'm starting to find this thread entertaining with the arguments that a Listing Broker vetting an unrepped buyer is seen as establishing an Agency Relationship.I like to do something called "Thought Experiments" which can at least help me to understand scenarios that are similar and may help work out the complexity.Scenario #1 - FSBO vets BuyersIf a FSBO vets Buyers, does this establishes a implied Agency relationship?!

I hope things work out for you Zach.