Knowledge is great but in my opinion it’s useless if you’re not actively using it, and it could be very dangerous if you’re accessing wrong or old information to solve new problems. 

It solves the now, and pushes the issue out with time to address it in full.

Do that for six months and all of this is solved.

It ended up going to auction, so I didn't actually get to solve the problemTrouble will budgeting for worst case is you can make your offer too low to actually buy it.

This makes the strategy viable for managing a due-on-sale clause, as it effectively keeps the transaction off the lender's radar, delaying or avoiding the clause's enforcement.While this method can solve the due-on-sale clause issue, it does come with a calculated risk—primarily depending on the trustworthiness of the seller and the specific legal environment.

All the more power to you if you figured out a way to solve for it. 

I hope this thread can help solve some issues hosts have with the experiences of others. 

Just getting a quitclaim deed before the foreclosure does not solve the problem, because the law gives redemption rights to the owner (now you, if you have a quitclaim deed) AND the borrower (which might be a different person than the current owner, especially if you have a quitclaim.) 

By that, I mean:- What kind of problems would it solve for you?

No clue why they do not let you.