However, without that, you really don't have any solid proof demonstrating it wasn't like that. 

And you're absolutely right rental on schedule E is so much easier to use to demonstrate intent.Your biggest challenge is the fact that putting your parents in there is very easy to interpret motives not investment making it personal property and not investment property. 

So the assertion that the "best case scenario" of "$1.5 mil/year (3% of $50mil)" is demonstrably false--because we've already proven it so.

@Pat Parrillo - thank you for the insight Pat that simplified analysis demonstrates nicely how a financing decision for a single property potentially has a significant effect on your long term goals.

I've worked with a couple financial planners in the past and neither seemed to be capable of doing more thorough analysis than I was given ~20 hours of work in Excel, so I'm looking for someone who can demonstrate to me quantitatively that their analysis is correct given whatever assumptions their modeling takes into account.Background:I currently own 5 properties, 14 units in Minneapolis/St.

I'm not an attorney, but I believe you both have the option to pull out if the date passes unless you might be able to demonstrate that it was at the fault of the seller.

See some links below to demonstrate what I'm talking about graphically. https://bluegoldresearch.com/crude-oil-petroleum-i...http://ir.eia.gov/wpsr/overview.pdf

Great job demonstrating details how to renovate sidings.

They have to demonstrate the need, you as the landlord have to sign for it and its not a long term solution but it would remove immediate eviction

However, if you do a good job of leasing it up quickly and can demonstrate a few months solid financials, then you should have no problem refinancing.