Actually you may not even to create one, this is the output of summary using NLP based AI:Question: according to biggerpockets forum, shall LP investors participate into multifamily capital call ?

See the source here:https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employ...Therefore, if your property management company manages 401k-owned property, it would be breaking two IRS rules: - Furnishing services to the plan- Receiving personal benefit (compensation) 

It is when the property is available to rent.You do not necessarily need earnings from the property to have deductible expenses (again, available for rent is not always the same date as the lease start).REP status is 750 hours in real estate activities PLUS material participation in the activity(ies).Talk to a CPA or tax pro who knows this stuff.

The participant loan feature of the Solo 401k could be a possible solution for you, however.

The building represented good value and is consistent with my focus on $2M-$5M total cost projects where there is a lack of natural market participants in the Philadelphia market.

I am interested to participate too, please send invite 

They willingly participated in cutting you out.

Hello all,I want to participate in a tax sale in Maryland.

Be a DON'T WANT-ER - always be willing and ready to walk if you can't get a good deal - And understand that you can always come back to that seller later and begin Second Stage NegotiationsAsk the 7 wordsAlways consider a subject to offerAlways ask for seller financingUse the Study Period Clause with right of possession to control properties without cashOffer seller participation - this is a great way to close dealsOffer something other cash - a note secured by your other equities, an unsecured note, a Principal only mortgage (using this technique you can offer more for the building since you are not paying interest - and as you know a direct reduction mortgage will pay off much faster.

I see the IRS regs about rental activities being defined as passive, but I don't see anything about a lower rate.I just see that this "passive activity" distinction subjects us to "passive activity loss rules", which limit our ability to offset other types of income with net passive losses.But even that limitation is negated for us because we fall into the "active participation" exception, so we can offset our regular earned taxable income dollar-for-dollar with losses from our rental (if I understand the regs correctly).