(It's happened)It's actually a misdemeanor to pass off "false documentation" for a therapy animal now, so not only is it permissable to ask for it, the prospective tenant can get in legal trouble for giving false documentation. 

Which of course is completely false. 

This resulted is a false influence scoring that had some shoot to the top of the pile as being an "expert" contributor.Let's take this into the business arena a moment.

I guess I'm operating under the false assumption that sellers are somewhat reasonable and have a desire to maximize their net.

Well to BP members and other's the answer is obvious but looks like the media wants to put a negative spin on it and say we are shutting out opportunity for these buyers.This is completely absurd.

If the same owner is owner or record or last seller of more than 3 of my comps I won't buy the house without mitigating the concern with a substancial concession... its frigging too easy to munipulate value falsely when the same person is sell in.

And I wasn't giving false hope to the seller agent or lender.

HV can sell themselves on what they have to offer as a franchise, I have no issue with that, just don't make false claims you can't possibly have the data to back up.Can you show me proof that no HV franchisee has ever gone belly up and regretted their 50k investment?  

Thee can be in the form of security deposit, insurance deposit, due diligence fees, etc.Don't buy into the false promises.

The complaint was false advertising for "cash offers".