Its relatively new structure(1995) and it goes for relatively cheap price.However, it has some damage to the ceiling sheet rock and plumbing was also damaged.

I would think that if you structured it such that your buyer paid the servicer, who paid you, who paid the servicer, who paid the original note, you could feasibly still take the deduction.May want to bring Shawn Watkins in on this...No tax/legal advice.

I read somewhere that even the thought of private ownership of real property should be addressed, that property should be held by corporate interests and the public would benefit by their interests in the corporate structure......well, isn't that what we basically have, one document says you own the house a deed, the other says the bank has a lien on it and you only get to use it until the bank gives it back to you and that the goverment can step in for the public good and pay you what is basically assessed by government institutions?

This covers the basic structure of the building and grounds.

There are a number of variables, such as soil type, compaction, and foundation type of the structure that have to be accounted for.

Retaining walls are one of the highest causes of litegation in the AEC world in regards to structure failure/distress.

I have a previous employer based 401K that I will be moving into some form of self directed structure, possibly a Solo 401K.

She would like to have someone buy her home and then structure a leaseback, so that she can stay in the home and eventually buy it back from the investor.

Because of that, I was looking at construction rather than buying existing structure.

Is there anything specific I need to look out for to make sure the problem is taken care of properly i.e damage to the structure etc.