Run your numbers based on youre required return given what youre likely to have to spend and the amount of headache, risk, and work you have to do.

Pricing models vary, but I use a flat-fee approach based on the intensity of design strategy and level of investor involvement.

It takes more effort and there's more risk involved (therefor more reward), but it just depends on your goals and how you want to get there.As far as focusing on areas with high demand for travel nurses, that's just 1 tenant-type of many in a changing landscape.

I think there is enough information online that another course isn't going to move the needle on getting involved with a MF property or not.

Murrells Inlet, in my opinion, is the better strategic route but you need to check out both and vet themselves for your risk tolerance.

I know your involved at a high level with Board of Realtors and state regulators .. 

The 2-3% points in extra cost are worth it if you plan on using as I described above because the use would be for a few  months at most and due to that short term use you can survive a rate adjustment up.But, if you have no plan to payoff the debt like when using for a down payment on a long term hold why pay the extra cost for flexibility and have the additional risk of the adjustable rate with the amortization looming when you can get a fixed rate second mortgage. 

For example, you might agree to a 70/30 or 60/40 split, depending on his level of involvement.

It seems like the perfect place, BiggerPockets, for finding people who are like-minded, asking them questions, and learning how to become a future investor.I believe that no matter how unforgiving the market may seem, the right tools, knowledge, and preparation can help minimize risk and create opportunities.

There’s no risk and all reward because if somebody can’t provide ID, they’re not going to be able to rent from me anyway.