As someone who used to work in SEO, I can see that the structure, length, and comparison format are classic SEO techniques.

I've vehemently argued against acquisition fees, syndicators that don't put a significant investment in their own deals, anything called a fund, large GP groups where you don't know who is in charge, and syndicators who ONLY raise money and don't manage the property, plus many other more minor sins. 

But theses people were in large part those with means, so all it takes is the lawyers to whoop people up enough and it's a tornado of suits upon suits upon suits. 

I've read about Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffets approach to investing at large and it resonates with me more so than the crypto-generation. 

there is an argument to take the equity and buy a large managed property. 

Just recently listened to a podcast on mid-term rentals specifically for traveling nurses but could also include corporate professionals or large-scale construction project workers.

These can sometimes offer good value and less competition from large investors.Key Questions to Ask Yourself:to @Joe Villeneuve point...what research are you looking at.Cash Flow vs.

I've largely stayed away from the "sub-to" buz word, but I have done a couple sub-to flips knowing that I only needed to hold onto them a couple months and I was prepared to pay off the notes if they were called.Sub-to for long-term hold on the other hand has me nervous. 

You don't understand what I'm saying regarding Market Analysis, which is understandable since it would be hard to explain in this limited format. 

Sure enough the rehab ran over budget (we had a large contingency that was used up -- some due to contractor malfeasance, some due to pulling the trigger on big repairs like a new roof) and the revenues were right around expectations, maybe slightly below.