With that, in a sense of logical and fundamental thinking i cant depict you, the majority of whites or section 8 recipients in any broad sense.

Salt Lake is seeing phenomenal growth with strong fundamentals.

Originally posted by @Antoine Smith:What stocks do you guys recommend In a situation like this, you would want to find stocks where the fundamentals haven't been affected, but the general macro economic conditions are pushing the price down. 

And there are good deals and bad deals today.If you have sound buying fundamentals, -- buy at a wholesale price-- never speculate-- create appreciation through value-add improvements-- buy for cash flow-- obtain favorable financing terms-- stick to workforce housing areas-- don't skimp on due diligence-- stress your underwriting-- have multiple exit strategies.If you think you're limited on deals & capital.. you will be.. regardless of what's happening in the marketplace.

Indy has not only good cash flow but has strong economic and demographic fundamentals.

Not to mention, waiting three months for a sheriff to come out is fundamentally unfair on the scales of justice and enables a 'playing of the system'.

But the truth is, if you have your buying criteria and fiscal fundamentals down to a tee: for instance, BUY FOR CASHFLOW and set your BREAKEVEN OCCUPANCY threshold, then you should just buy Real Estate. 

He didn't ask about understanding the fundamentals of deal anaylsis.

Unrelated to investing per se but relative to fundamentally addressing the real world practices of effecient infrastructure in residential buildings as a whole is the extreme and profound unwillingness of individual property owners to actually embrace and implement equipment & methodologies to mitigate the "purported" climate crisis.From my myopic perspective having to fight with residential customers who have zero knowledge of thermo dynamic, ohm's law and efficiency measures is highly hypocritical.People claim to care but are closed minded to energy saving and efficient operating homes.End rant

Hartman continues to exhibit a fundamental misunderstanding of NREIG’s role in determining whether his claimed loss was in fact covered under the relevant policy.