p=882850900Link in your post above does not give anything worthwhile; could you perhaps give us an updated link to illustrate what you were trying to demonstrate?

$2400/$20,000 cash invested is a 12% cash on cash return annually- which may be acceptable, but it ignores the appreciation.If you sell the house at the end of year 1 (ignore transaction costs just for illustration) for $102K - up just 2%, that's $2000 of additional capital gains which boosts your total IRR by 10% up to 22% ($4400/20000 invested).

I think your posts illustrate your dedication to the industry and your trade.

Kiyosaki's principles are well illustrated by the parables in his series of RDPD books.

It just illustrates the importance of being 100% accurate, up-front and totally transparent from the beginning and it is hard to do that if you are not in control of every part of the transaction.  

The last common idea would be illustrating that some form of dual tracking is present, where the Borrower sought relief was engaged by the Mortgagee or Servicer and the FC continued in process.  

(The 100 people is BS to illustrate a point) Just because I buy a house under market doesn't mean I am acting in an illegal manor or an unethical manor.

But as the above example illustrates, you can blast through lower limits without ever doing anything wrong.

I would suggest asking for bank statements or pages of tax returns that illustrate the actual property profit/loss and actual rents paid.

Allow me to illustrate.