Just like in Southern Italy, where houses are sold for as little as one euro, similar initiatives exist in Spain to attract people to repopulate villages and revitalize these areas." the one part I'd disagree with is "many".So why was I shocked then?

The cleanest route but the least attractive method for most investors is to have the investor provide debt.

High bedroom counts to attract guests for weddings, families etc.

Our project management kept everything on schedule, making the property highly attractive to buyers.

They usually sell for a really attractive price because investment property financing is (obviously) difficult, somewhat limiting the buyer pool to owner-operator small business owners (who in turn are typically great clients, as well).  

This being my first go at this, I'm curious about that building the exit value/attractiveness? 

He believes that area where he will be buying the new homes is going to appreciate and attract more MTRenters, but now, the big difference is that he would now have 3 properties that can go up (or potentially down) in value, go up (or down) in rent, and three times as many vacancies to fill.My back of the napkin assessment is that for only a drop in $200 a month in cash flow, he would control a lot more assets with growth potential and as rents rise over the coming years, the combined rents will increase to a total more than the single rent.HOWEVER.

Homes with that price range will attract bad renters.

THE attractive feature to me of MHP is renting the lots, not renting homes.   

As I said, how we do it stems from our fundamental design.