It's not so much I am distrustful and not so much I am trustful. but it seems like it is a lot of resistance when you are try they keep the control on things and make it seem that way, and they've said you can try to have two closing companies co-operate, amend the contract, send the contract to seller again. so it is meeting a lot of resistance with all parties, I figure I'd do my due diligence, the title company are more than reputable and good folks. there is a good enough relations with the listing agent, seller's lawyer, and title company whom after my calls have all implicitly told me basically "there are no liens, it's clear, there's nothing to worry about"...for me to then fight them on it.

Judging on the ARV at 70%, thought that was fairly good...but apparently not good enough.  

Calculate the worse possible scenario and figure out if you're getting a good enough deal to cover that.

If they were competent enough to know the GC's job good enough to know if they're doing it right, why do they need the GC?

If the deal is good enough, it should not be hard to find one.Happy Investing

That is how all the subdivision developers around here do it, so I guess it is good enough for a small fish like me.

I like Indy... steer clear of low end urban core under 50 k and if its good enough for Buffet I would think Omaha is good enough for the rest of us..

(AAT) - 3.83% RoECousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) - 2.03% RoEIf you want to find something in that range, you need to look at megacorps like Exxon Mobil (18.27% RoE).But in BP-land, 15-20% isn't good enough - I've gotta go for the hot markets!

But in an ideal situation if it's a great property, loopnet /costar is good enough, tenants will hunt you down for it.

I always suggest doing some research and do the math to make sure the ROI is good enough to keep you moving.Feel free to send me a message with any questions.