Hi everyone,Can someone kindly explain the phrase underlined below in simpler English? 

Because I lend money to other investors, everytime I raise capital from private investors, I phrase it in the 5C's that lenders use when lending money:C - Credit rating of the sponsor: and this is not just the credit score but does the sponsor ever lost money for investors?

Taking this post down and re-phrasing, may allow you to get some other agents to respond that will help you.

You don't keep vendors 'in line' you hire the ones who don't need to be kept in line or better yet wouldn't work for anyone whom voiced such a phrase to them.

But their trade mark of really bad English and over-polished phrasing remains.

Obviously, the shorter the better, but also it helps to have words starting with the same letter or catch phrases.

Look for phrases like lender "shall forgive the deficiency/balance" "shall not pursue the balance of the debt" "shall waive the deficiency /balance" "shall consider the $ received as full satisfaction of..." etc.NOT "lender shall lender release the mortgage for the $ received, but retain the right to puruse...."

But this phrase is interesting:if the sale does not ultimately happenWhy does that come into play?  

Though after some contemplation I thought maybe I should be phrasing the letter in a different way.

This trend is likely to continue, I’m putting my thoughts out, however would love to hear feedback.