90% occupancy, that’ll definitely cover the note and expenses (assuming you bought right).Nice might be right for you’re choice of living conditions, but not always the right choice for your investments.

@Heath Ryans Hey Heath sorry for the question being vague.

@Heath Ryans thank you for your help clarifying.

Example:  If you have a choice between paying $100k for a property or 20k and leveraging $80k, you are far better off only spending $20k.Numbers:  $20k down = $200/m or $2400/yr; $100k down = $400/m or $4800/yr.Buy 2 properties using $20k down for each and you have the same cash flow as the $100k DP option. 

Of course, there will be a premium attached for their work, and you can expect to pay cash or equivalent (hard money or line or credit), but this is still a great choice for someone who doesn't want to (or can't afford to) do all the work of marketing to find motivated sellers.

@Paniz Kosarianfard I have a client that moved from Dallas to the Bay Area and I don't think the Bay Area would be my top choice.

@Ryan RushThere would be private lenders or hard money lenders; who can do a blanket loan; as a fixed DEBT funding; as a loan on the property.Some people go for EQUITY funding with private lenders. 

However if the roles were reversed, I would feel quite insulted that you feel, I as a seller can't make my own choices.

@Ryan Kelly I definitely will, thank you!

. ;-) Thank you again for sharing your story, and congrats for doing something that may not have been “the popular choice,” but without-a-doubt was the fastest and most effective.