
18 March 2017 | 15 replies
Check out https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p925.pdf Publication 925: Passive Activity and At-Risk Rules for more info on that.The carpet IS tangible personal property (unless it's in the bathroom or something weird that changes it) with accelerated depreciation treatment, but because of the low cost it could be eligible for safe harbor: that depends if you've done anything else that qualifies for safe harbor and have high enough unadjusted cost basis since there are limits.

23 July 2020 | 23 replies
Just will not tolerate such treatment, holding of funds etc... is no way to do business.When you hear these stories.

25 May 2018 | 9 replies
All you need is a PTIN which is quite easy to get.Agree with everything but the repairs - if the facts and circumstances allow for repair treatment vs capitalizing and depreciating, repair treatment is generally the best option regardless of income trends.

19 November 2019 | 84 replies
Give them the silent treatment until they double message you back, in which you go back to your 80k offer since the other person was obviously false

2 January 2020 | 5 replies
It is almost always cheaper to keep an existing tenant rather than getting a new one, due to empty days, marketing/screening costs, cleaning, time invested, improvements needed, etc.Above all, treat all tenants the same, don't show any preferential treatment.

9 May 2016 | 32 replies
And, while REITS do not qualify, there is a whole family of fractional real estate being sold by securities dealers which qualifies for 1031 treatment.

28 August 2017 | 15 replies
Also, a SINGLE spraying is not a proper treatment.

15 October 2016 | 42 replies
Property that you have purchased with the primary intent of resale does not qualify for 1031 treatment.

22 March 2017 | 19 replies
You're kind of trying to have your cake it eat it too :I want the tax treatment as though my house was my primary for 2 yearsI also wanted/made rental income from the house for 11 months though You picked a bad day to ask it's a corporate tax deadline so no one else has chimed in yet haha hopefully @Brandon Hall or@Jake Hottenrott Can chime in with their wisdom.

31 March 2017 | 9 replies
It unfortunately makes sense in regard to the "new" treatment of the deduct - depreciate question.