I didn't mean to imply all lease neded to be renewed or for one year, but initially the tenant must be there for a year since they are not going to send payments to different landlords every three months...whatever.

When I read your earlier post it sounded very much like you were implying that the official position of the IRS was a preference for an EA over other tax professionals.

I want to do that legally, ethically and in such a way that it provides some measure of security for my existing company while providing some financial incentives and a level of security for other partners to join.Again, I am NOT trying to do things the wrong way (as you seem to imply).

The bottom line here is that I do not want to allow my neighbor to create an implied easement or a prescriptive easement because she decided to build an illegal addition onto the property line without taking into consideration that eventually she would be required to maintain the home.

Sure, I didnt lose any money out of my pocket, but to imply that what the lender 'possibly' may have done is cool or alright is kind of messed up.

I believe I used a company called Real Estate Trainers . . . that was about 12 years ago.

Yes, the washer and dryer are probably an implied part of the lease, since they were available when the lease was signed.

We are not really at odds here Dion, I never said and didn't mean to imply that a lender did not have the right or option to seek any remedy for the violation of the trust.

Yes, some of the trainers advise to "churn, churn, churn" - collect non-refundable option consideration, and when the buyer doesn't qualify to buy at end of option period, you find another "buyer" and it repeats ...

The DOS is optional and the lender's non-action implies that so far the lender has no issue.