data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bc70/7bc700acf452ff316651ee862bbc1626d66cf0b8" alt=""
12 July 2012 | 2 replies
I am merely looking for people's general opinions on the situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c620e/c620efc0dc740e9bce02d78ae8e9254545d12f4f" alt=""
21 August 2012 | 13 replies
I was merely using it as an example of how I've been hit financially by my unit this year and couldn't afford a large deductible for my roof in addition to what I have already paid out for the sewer.
19 September 2012 | 4 replies
(current apt. cannot release info to me re: this), and he was trying to get into my apt. as cheap as poss. in an attempt to squat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d603/9d603431487b41d9270ce3f19fb46411ba5956c6" alt=""
10 November 2012 | 17 replies
I agree, like the police stops in the middle of the street looking for expired inspection stickers, this is merely a fundraiser.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5775/e5775d75b43fc7800dfec787494a6a2894077ddb" alt=""
1 November 2012 | 23 replies
I probably would not advise claiming the mere collection of rent monthly as my proof of regular involvement in the real estate business.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48c94/48c94923cfc7d67ce532d0d4e8800b377c9e22ec" alt=""
20 September 2007 | 6 replies
Credit Partners does not have down payment requirements when buying the property (but are merely using the new partner’s good credit). 1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc03/5fc031d3763e7a53930c4b32a4ece71358f19c17" alt=""
7 January 2008 | 19 replies
WH.....this is good, but again i am thinking on a couple things here, only wanting to make things flow as simply as possible with little to no gliches at the end of the transaction....i'll try to explain what i mean and maybe i'm speaking for many out there that are making some attempt to find success in this endeavor....in regard only to a short sale transaction the following occurs:property owner (let's call this person the "seller") allows for an individual (let's call this person the "buyer") to "purchase" the property merely for the sake of the "buyer" moving forward to deal with the loss mit people at the lender.as time moves along, this "buyer" gets written confirmation of the lender accepting the "price" offered via the customery HUD-1.now let's say for illustration purposes the "approved" price the lender has agreed to is $250000, the value of the property seems to be in the neighborhood of $350000 and the "buyer" wants to "double escrow" this bad boy for $300000 (generating a clean $50K profit)......in this illustration/scenario the question remains: "what is the cleanest, simplist" way to accomplish this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cfc/e0cfc35d8f807519664cd4efa118351dca91dbe9" alt=""
22 October 2007 | 9 replies
Their mere presence does not guarantee anything.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d80/05d80ea6d7a9becdf4c95b28f5f9b1e937733498" alt=""
29 August 2007 | 17 replies
In my previous post, I was merely stating popular misconceptions that were created due to the actions of a relatively small number of criminals that operate freely within your industry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eb51/6eb51e358a6d94d345998f3ad05866bee741c6e5" alt=""
6 October 2007 | 5 replies
When there is an issue like this, some swampped asset managers will merely put that property in a "holding pattern" and come back to it when everything is all clear.I'd recommend that you have your agent speak with the listing agent, and have the listing agent call the asset manager to ask, "Is this property available for purchase right now?"