I noticed they left so much behind when they left--(seems to happen a lot).I noticed that this was an affordable housing unit.Taxpayers gross up the renter to afford to live in a better dwelling than they can afford.Leaving them extra expendable income from their earnings.Nice program, but so many seem to accumulate a lot of consumer goods and just fill the unit with them.Not all, because I have entered units that are military clean looking and decorated tastefully.The thing is, when they leave, they seem to leave behind all of the consumer goods they bought.It just seems strange...leave everything out on display and live a jumble of things vs put them away, and then leave them.And I have seen some very substandard housing situations with the same situation.What did the haul off and cost and did you have to bug bomb the place?

By definition they are an investment.Purchasing an OO home can be investing (expend money with the expectation of achieving a profit or material result)  I have no problem with Robert K calling a home a liability.  

Equity may be where my money goes to die, but I seek peace more-so now than expending all my energy into maximizing returns.  

Corporations, PACs and SIGs expend buku-bux to keep it that way.The question of " to be or not to be" a licensed agent?

I figured give it 10 years and with more investments and similar decisions and I'll buy these with passive income and won't have to worry about it being a "depreciating asset" - it will be like furniture, nice to have, usable and expendable. 

There's nothing in it for them so why expend a ton of time on it.

I am just struggling to determine what the "norm" is for expending versus capitalizing.

You pay a small royalty to the designer, but it is well worth it for the effort you would have to expend as an alternative.

Just looking to expend to a different market.

All of which can be expend greatly and rapidly.