The tenants' behavior is the seller's problem right now; the seller being greedy kept him from completing the eviction, and that greed has a price that devalues the property.But how is the tenant preventing inspection of the roof?

- Is it an attitude, action or behavior?

Now, I'm not saying there isn't an argument for philanthropy, but nor do I agree that it is society's responsibility to support the lazy or unwilling.this story illustrates motivated self-interest and what happens when human behavior takes over:

I am not trying to advocate for unethical behavior but I am discerning what I would say is real risk, which is risk of financial loss, everything else to me is background noise.

Look at the return pattern of the Wilshire 5000 since 2009, in the teeth of a lousy economy, all driven by irresponsible Fed behavior.

I've given up on trying to predict bank behavior.

I don't know if they are just compulsive liars, or if they figure most landlords just won't check.

There is neighbor resistance to special needs, particularly when you are talking about violent behavior, sexual behavior, drug & alcohol treatment, or prison halfway houses.

In other words, the immediate eviction clause in combination with the behavior is basically a coerced situation.

Is it their behavior or is there a physical difference?