![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/760997/small_1621496826-avatar-jasonp153.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 June 2018 | 17 replies
Me wanting it to my "supreme wisdom" that convinced her is just pure ego.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/600867/small_1621493537-avatar-brianwchs.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 June 2017 | 2 replies
Equity Skimming and Washington State lawhttps://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/311/topics/449966-equity-skimming-and-washington-state-lawWA Supreme Court Decision, 2/6/14, Jametsky v.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/224529/small_1621434426-avatar-djbenedict.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 June 2017 | 10 replies
It was this group who actively pursued this case all the way through to the Supreme Court.Up until now, no clear distinction was being made between an assigned collector - retained by a creditor to collect a debt - and those who purchase defaulted debt.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/618409/small_1621493926-avatar-brantonb.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 June 2017 | 4 replies
WA Supreme Court Decision, 2/6/14, Jametsky v.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/697687/small_1695067278-avatar-davew39.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 January 2017 | 7 replies
There is a relatively recent Pennsylvania case that went all the way to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/668043/small_1621495084-avatar-ryanm212.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 July 2017 | 14 replies
I may check back with Supreme Lending and see if they'll go for it.
11 July 2017 | 65 replies
Using a service based in California to rent a room or apartment in another state is clearly interstate commerce.I have also read what the Supreme Court said in Wickard v.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/684605/small_1621495416-avatar-mikaelam.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 July 2017 | 3 replies
@Mikaela McConville In California, the state supreme court ruled that requiring an agent to join the Association of Realtors as pre-requisite to MLS access was a violation of antitrust law.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/275933/small_1621440869-avatar-pjb1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 September 2017 | 18 replies
They just sent out a marketing blurb on how they won a case that made it all the way to the Ohio supreme court.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/305938/small_1621443128-avatar-lindaw9.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
9 October 2017 | 3 replies
Sometimes you just can't get stuff through...It is not like owning your own duplex where you are the boss, leader, and supreme ruler (with your spouse or partner if you have one)....