You need to look at the credentials of the person offering the education and whether it is him offering the education or just one of his assistants.The cost should also be reasonable, in my opinion.If you are taking a class, not a personal 1v1, I don't understand why a class would cost more than $100 an hour.If you are getting 1vs1 communication, I can then see it costing $300+if the person does not have an visable experience, I would not consider paying for the experience.I also question these investors being oversold on someone they don't need.In my opinion, a person can retire by getting 10 homes backed by fannie mae / freddie mac loans.The oversell to getting outside capital to get a large complex is likely being sold to investors who don't have / make a lot of money.

I have been in communication with @Scott Trench about the topics you have raised, and I believe we are operating in line with what management is currently allowing on the forums.Booooooooooooooooooooo.

It wasn't the messiest thing I've seen, but still required clean up on my end which the clients weren't happy about at all.The third client is a self employed hair dresser and she compained of poor communication, inability to understand what they wanted form her and complete confusion over their payroll directions.For the price paid, I'd say the results were mediocre at best.

First he has to stop communicating like he is.  

Or can i only log the hours that I spent in communicating with the GC regarding the work?   

Anna didn’t have the financial resources to make the move on her own, and on top of that, she spoke very little English, which made communication challenging.

How has tenant communication and compliance been?

I would seek out a good local PM preferably with 30-120 units.I am not familiar with that market so if that is not possible there is self managing, or finding a limited service provider (we just went statewide in FL) where we provide guest communication, automations, pricing, and marketing for a discounted fee. 

Finds (1) half of what plaintiffs told him is incorrect or untrue; the potential defendant has filed all the correct paperwork for Reg D and hence has “statutory” protection against almost all but fraud; unlike what the plaintiffs believe and told the attorney the risks WERE disclosed to them, NO specific return was promised them; and the defendants have not stopped communications; they merely grew tired of the 82 daily phone calls asking, accusing, and raging by the same three plaintiffs.  

Maybe they communicate differently but have good intentions.