Tenants not only have access to the regular free resources like the Rent Board, the San Francisco Tenants Union, the Housing Rights Committee, but with the passage of Prop F from a couple years back they now have free representation for evictions paid for by tax dollars.

@Brian Larson  The info mentioned above by Account Closed used to be correct, but with the recent passage of AB1482 unfortunately no longer is.

For the most part it has been clear to me that you were questioning the ethics of the mentor or his attorney partner, but the clarification helps.I am unclear why the passage quoted by Kelvin K. would arouse your ire:_____The prospective mentor's agency has completed over 1500 sub2/wrap transactions and only 3 have had "Due on Sale" clauses called.

I just read this passage from Mark this morning.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca...I tried to find the passage you referenced about a mandated 25% rent decrease in CA but my eyes glazed over trying to read that text. 

Through the simple passage of time, she may have accrued a legally recognized defense against future attempts to foreclose. 

On the other side of the coin, if you wait, then eventually someone will pull a title report and will redeem, and you will earn more money due to the passage of time and the 12% per year interest.  

Consider it a right of passage, if you will.

At this time, there are over 20 buildings in Waikiki where it is allowed - even after the passage of Bill 41.  

Because the Act would increase taxes, passage requires the approval of 2/3 of the membership of each house of the California Legislature.