Jaqueline Price
Protecting yourself as a birddog...
22 October 2007 | 9 replies
The substance of the transaction matters more than the document.John Corey
Dick Green
100% CLTV No Credit Check
17 April 2008 | 9 replies
As for the ethics of any transaction I work on....I've built my business based on the premise of doing no harm to any participants involved in the transaction.
Emma Powdrill
Greetings From The UK!
14 September 2007 | 6 replies
There is nothing wrong with the bold here, but like posting in ALL CAPS, it is considered rude netiquette.No harm, no foul.
N/A N/A
Ryan Urban
Attorneys and Subject To
25 June 2008 | 32 replies
If they do not exercise it then no harm done.You can send a certified letter to the lender letting them know.
N/A N/A
Las Vegas Renters?
16 October 2007 | 7 replies
Other states have tried this only to repeal the law when they found that it did more harm than good.
N/A N/A
Bank Ownership vs. Mortgage Co. ownership of REO Few Q's
16 October 2007 | 5 replies
I suppose their is no harm in trying to make an offer on other properties and seeing what happens.
N/A N/A
Investor in the San Fernando Valley, CA
20 October 2007 | 3 replies
Make sure your posts have substance.
Mac Bradley
Impact IRS lien has on a property purchased at foreclosure
7 January 2008 | 7 replies
The Trustee may give you a cold stare but they will merely re-auction the property with no harm done.Once a house is sold at the auction, the IRS has 120 days from the day you bought it, to sieze the property.If they actually do that, they will pay you the amount you paid for the house plus 4% (some claim it is 6%).BUT....
Eric Foster
-------> Challenge For You! <-------
16 June 2008 | 38 replies
No harm, no foul . . . hopefully we'll get another wave in the near future!