In fact, someone just called me last week and had a non-performing rental package that they purchased in the same fashion and the prices they bought at, considering the actual condition and historical performance of the properties was too high in my opinion. 

This is purely anecdotal, but I've noticed that the top performing properties in my area lead with an exterior shot.

If these homes were such great investments, they would keep them for their own portfolio.When you purchase an investment, calculate your returns based on actual performance.

Finally, the compact size of tiny homes often results in lower utility costs, further enhancing their affordability and sustainability.

Put together a spreadsheet and compare the performance of the subject property if you keep renting it as is for the next 10 or 20 years versus if you rehab and refinance.

I would say it depends on how well the chunk of cash in your 401k is performing compared to the asset you are acquiring.

Not sure why that happen, however the best way to screen a potential tenant is to see how they have performed in the past. 

Tossed around quite a bit and it isn't what it once was, but the value is still very high based on past performance and brand recognition.

That said, I’ve found that properties in C-class neighborhoods tend to perform best with Section 8 tenants.

What type of loans are you buying, performing, non performing, seller financed?