If evidence of smoking is found on the property, Resident may be deemed to be in default."

Well, yes probably, but when I bought the house, there was very little evidence of comps that supported an increase in value.

Well, yes probably, but when I bought the house, there was very little evidence of comps that supported an increase in value.

If it takes longer for any reason, you have to read what your contract says about it, but you may not have any choice but to let them keep working on it.However, if they have breached ANY other provision in the contract- ghosted the job site without written notification and justification; not followed the scope of work included in the contract; violated any black and white term of the agreement- then maybe you have evidence to claim breach of contract.

My guess from an HR perspective (same burdens of proof apply), if they are the only protected class, and you are only evicting them, make sure you have evidence of why you are evicting them.

Housing prices were going up, and the debt to buy those houses cost almost nothing.Today, housing prices are uncertain at best, and there's plenty of evidence they're falling, and debt is 2x+ what it cost a year ago.

It gives you the details you need, the questions you can ask, the evidence you can require. https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfil...Unfortunately, the laws are written in such a way that your Tenant can just keep on trying different methods until they finally figure it out, then you have to accept the animal.

While fha is generally seen as shakier, this is due to someone who supposedly can’t qualify for conventional and/or is short on cash, which can cause issues if they are not aware of the 5-6% closing costs and prepaids.There is nothing wrong with asking for evidence of sufficient cash to close from any financed buyers.

If you told him you have been playing pickup games for the past year and need help improving your jump shot, now he has evidence you're motivated and a specific goal he can quickly help you work towards.

The person with evidence typically wins.