Brian Burke with Praxis Capital, and Joe Fairless are a few.Most investors do not want an indefinite hold period.

He also does not want to buy a home under quarantine indefinitely.

It is absolutely no different that car makers or stereo salesmen (think Judge Reinhold in "Ruthless People") who say "you should buy this, you deserve it."

Apparently the installer was having some serious issues, as I was told by HD they took them off of their approved vendor's list and when I called the installer myself, they were closed indefinitely.  

Assuming electricity rates will continue to increase at about 4% per year, this is how one of my two solar systems pencils out over 5 years (the lease is longer than 5 years because I intend to hold this property indefinitely):  .solarelectric utility # months6060IR1.00%4.00%payment year 14060Payment year 5$41.02$66.30with electric utility base charge$51.02$66.30savings per month in year 5$15.270savings per year in year 5$183.290total solar savings years 1-5:$790.050total solar savings years 1-20:$5,201.760total solar savings including RETC$7,601.76010.  

Without a lease, these tenants shouldn't have a right to be living there (unless the existing lease has a clause stating visitors being welcome for an indefinite period of time).

It doesn't look good when you admit to getting huge benefits from a government program and then want to take away those benefits for others.Now, even if that doesn't become an issue, remember that Ryan voted for TARP, he voted for the auto bailouts, he voted for Medicare expansion, he voted for housing subsidies, he voted for unemployment extensions, he voted for a national ID, he voted for making the patriot act permanent, he voted for surveillance without a warrant, he voted fro no child left behind, he voted for keeping troops in Iraq indefinitely, and he voted for the 2008 and 2009 stimulus.And then he stands up and claims he's for smaller government, fewer handouts and less regulation.While there may be justifiable reason for it, the fact is, his record doesn't support his stated views...and that's never a good thing for a politician.

., and its allies have argued that a temporary expensing regime does not provide an equal benefit, and results in a tax cliff at the end of the five-year period.The use of Section 1031 like-kind exchanges to defer taxes indefinitely, and the possibility to eventually escape taxation, is also mentioned in the explanation.Republicans Set Aggressive Tentative Schedule, Aim for ThanksgivingThe proposed schedule to move the bill through the legislative process, updated this week, is as follows:Week of November 6: Markup in the House Ways & Means Committee.Week of November 13: House Floor consideration of the tax reform bill. / Markup (tentative) in the Senate Finance Committee.November 17 - December 24: Passage of tax reform bill targeted for as early as the Thanksgiving recess (November 17) or as late as Christmas Eve.The goal of the White House and Republican leadership is to have a tax reform bill signed into law within the next 3 to 8 weeks.If the bill is passed into law:December 31, 2017: Deadline to complete sale/acquisition of either relinquished or replacement property, in order to qualify for treatment of Section 1031.January 1, 2018: Modifications to Section 1031 become effective.The legislative schedule is aggressive.

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/01128Last Action: 5/3/2019 Senate • Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from considerationSigh...

A loss is a perk of real estate, always capture that as you can carry a passive loss indefinitely.