PML would only consider bridge, fix and flip or ground up construction from my experience 

Hey @Chance CovanIf you're exploring options beyond traditional financing and haven't owned a primary residence for at least 12 months, starting with a bridge loan might be your best bet.

The main investor still wants to go through with it *if* they can find someone to go in half’s with them, but I’m afraid they won’t be able to find someone to go in with them in time.Here’s some more info, if it makes a difference, so you could give more spot on advice: the house is extremely unique in California, three hours east of SF in the Sierra Nevada mountains & and was built by a bridge maker as his own residence back in the 60’s, so it’s one of a kind.

They will raise that other money to bridge the debt vs equity and pay that new debt at interest only to keep the payments lower. all this is doing is kicking the can down the road.

In such situations, a bridge loan to rehabilitate the property followed by refinancing becomes necessary.

A bridge loan might be your best option here.

all these courses with floating bridge loan is used to bankrupt you folks

Good luck and I'd love to hear how it goes once you cross that bridge.

Of course if you do strike out with the Site length committee, this money is all just water under the bridge.

In the winter you have the snowbirds, the in summer you have the MTV parties at Copper Canyon (it made the photo cover of the phone book one year), and the rest of the year you have people driving back and forth over the London Bridge, and can't find it because it's smaller than they think (lol).