You can also push the noise violations or that the smoking is disturbing the health of other occupants.My real question: did you see this "contract" before closing and accept it? 

The rule is if you don’t disturb it, you don’t have to abate it.

It's really starting to disturb me Uwe and I can't believe there isn't more attention focused on this.

I would find that disturbing, also.

That being said if you can afford it, it's probably best to at least have someone check out the property in person within about 6-8 hours after whomever sees the property just to verify nothing is missing or disturbed.

I think I find this more disturbing because any time someone has said things like that to me, I *have* felt a vibe of jealousy.

this is a little disturbing for me because I am looking to move within the next two months and I am self-employed.  

The system of layering entities and giving them ownership of different assets is a great way to protect assets in industries where there is likely to be lawsuits or other "disturbances."

I haven't gotten to tear through this entire site, but thus far it certainly seems to have a wealth of potentially interesting topics and participants (those that follow the rules and aren't banned, which seems to be a disturbingly high percentage of the posts I've seen thus far - is it that hard to not turn a post into an advertisement for oneself?!).

CBS Video LinkThis is one of the most disturbing reports I've seen in a while concerning privacy.