That's the problem as we have this middle man we have to go through, when we have complaints, and they have to escalate it to the owner.

@Tim Ryan If I am understanding this correctly....you rationalize your mentor's decision to offer mentorship despite only a 2-3% success rate because it's unclear who will be successful and therefore nobody should be turned away.

While this doesn’t cut out the middleman completely, you can find excellent investment opportunities for flipping houses at a much better price than you’ll find on public real estate markets.

@Caleb L.I would say it is fine, so long as your job is not just to find a property for an investor by middle man communications between a broker and the investor for a small payment (pretty much what a broker does).

You are only promoting participation trophies and rationalizing poor marketing.

A common mistake is assuming that people always behave rationally and make decisions in their best interest.

If you want to talk and get help, start by accepting my invite to a recorded and live Zoom so you can try to say your piece rationally.

The illiquidity of certain market types has not even been rationalized by wall street.

If the current interest rates are low, you are interested in buying more and your debt to income ration won't impede you buying more....I wouldn't pay them off aggressively. 

Attempting to get in the middle of 2 sophisticated parties with a competitive middle man already in the market (commercial brokers) is tough.