If it's just a money grab and there is no desire to associate with the aforementioned, you will most likely be on the losing end and feel very negative about the program.

When that happens you will only lose part of your cash flow rather than all of it if you have multiple DSTS vs one larger one.

If you reduce to $2,300 and are able to fill the property faster, yes, you are "losing" $100 per month, but even at that rate, it would take two whole years to equal the loss of the $2,400 vacancy month.

Have you ever heard of a Landlord being sued by a Tenant and losing property?

Normally, companies keep changing their name after losing all investor’s money.

Quote from @Dan Mcguire: One reason not to invest, is not to lose money.

Learning that the slower I move, the more money I lose.

This also leaves me with $3,750 stuck in the deal (not including financing and closing costs, which could easily add another $20,000).In total, if I had to include closing costs and financing costs, I’d have about $23,000 (if not more) tied up in the deal and lose close to $700/month before accounting for expenses.

if you buy a random property in a neighborhood you've never been to and turn it over to people you don't know you'll just lose money.not trying to be negative, trying to protect you and your hard earned cash.

If he owes a decent amount on the property, wouldnt the conventional route make him lose whatever interest rate he has?