Nothing good will come of this. 

If you proactively offered him even a small extra piece, say 5%, that would be huge in his eyes and buy you a lot of goodwill.....

While it is not required, it seems like an easy gesture of goodwill. 

Those who buy subsidized properties are gambling their financial independence upon the good will of the taxpayer who has just about reached the limits of his willingness to support these social programs.

I'm very conflicted but open to any honest and good-willed feedback!

Lastly, with the Covid-19 shutdown currently in effect and unemployment at records highs considering the 1929 US population was 122MM @ 24.9% at its peak (as opposed to the 328MM population we have today), do you suspect lowering the cost in general for both Wealthability programs might be considered to encourage those of us currently not working and as a goodwill gesture for the unprecedented economic situation we find ourselves in? 

They come standard when a property is sold in Texas as an act of good will but I absolutely hate the practice.

Thank you for exemplifying the greed-driven mentality that pervades our society, where profiting off the thirst for knowledge takes precedence over genuine goodwill.

They are still having evictions even with people they place, but at least I’m not having to deal with sad sack stories personally.There’s a saying that says, “give the devil an inch and he will take a mile. “ When it comes to tenants if you listen to a sad story about why they don’t have the money to pay their rent they take the Goodwill offered and stretch it a mile.

Hit up the Goodwill, maybe a Restore.