![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1150566/small_1621509623-avatar-ryand310.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 December 2018 | 3 replies
I've never dealt with a short sale before and unfortunately there really isn't any good information on the pre-existing threads here or on the blog.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1193076/small_1727753629-avatar-amir_khan.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 December 2018 | 12 replies
If you are sophisticated & not accredited, you can invest in 506(b) syndications, which are not publicly advertised and require you to have a pre-existing relationship with sponsors.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/814746/small_1621498417-avatar-haod1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 October 2018 | 20 replies
(30-45 days.)One alternative is a line of credit against a rental or commercial property that has no pre-existing mortgage - or a HELOC.
18 March 2019 | 13 replies
Do you know if any problems preexist on the property.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/893626/small_1621505125-avatar-henriques.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 April 2019 | 17 replies
@Henrique SousaIn order for you to invest in syndications two components must be met.1) As others mentioned - you must have sufficient pre-existing relationships.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/150258/small_1636786607-avatar-jillian_sidoti.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 April 2019 | 13 replies
Today the SEC came out with this as part of their complaint against a defendant selling private securities:"Respondents did not have pre-existing, substantive relationships with a number of the Fund’s investors and engaged in a general solicitation of public interest in the offering through Fund's website and traditional media interviews."
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/329845/small_1674401826-avatar-7einvestments.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 April 2019 | 6 replies
Today the SEC came out with this as part of their complaint against a defendant selling private securities: "Respondents did not have pre-existing, substantive relationships with a number of the Fund’s investors and engaged in a general solicitation of public interest in the offering through Fund's website and traditional media interviews."
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/731411/small_1621496284-avatar-kendalls6.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 April 2019 | 6 replies
Some exemptions permit the general solicitation of investors, some require a substantive pre-existing relationship.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1217433/small_1694779768-avatar-melaniez1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 March 2019 | 3 replies
@Scott Mac I called them before I called the contractor , they assessed it as not being covered because it was “structural” and also preexisting (switch homeowners insurance last year in order to bundle and save)
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/827647/small_1621499752-avatar-nickl85.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 February 2020 | 14 replies
Also, having pre-existing tenants may be a good or a bad thing, especially the one that recently signed the lease.