I am not an attorney - but logically;  this idea just has to be patently false.  

I expect that it won't flatten for a while and it's not too absurdly high now that an investor can't be creative and make a profit.

Starting each refute with TRUTH: Why not the normal True/False format?

Tim I can honestly appreciate your answer its straight forward to the point and explains your views clearly. why can't jawsette answer the question constantly dodging the question throwing up false arguments the change the subject its like trying to debate a child talking in a circle.

If any one single prophecy were proven false, or one fact (as presented) were proven false, then you could say that the whole belief is wrong.

Falsifying information or make false statement on a loan application can get you in trouble.

I think it’s absurd that people really think that African Americans are really given a fair shot.Rich I don’t think that African Americans are considering any event as a crutch but a hurdle that we will jump over, just like we’ve done and will always do.

Treat tenants fairly and in a consistent manner.Follow these carefully and you won't need entities that give you a sense of false security. :)

This is really absurd when stated this way, but in my opinion that's what's really going on.

Either/or both will give you more useful knowledge (in my opinion), and one only adds a few glances over your shoulder in a process you already have in place.I can't help but see social media screening as a shortcut towards the same end as home visits, ultimately, but with less usefulness and a false sense that you're mitigating risk on marginal applications, if they even get that far, as you'll likely deny good renters who simply don't want the invasion of privacy.