Let's say the investor is sued by a tenant and found grossly negligent in the lawsuit.

Not sure the realities or risks but I know it happens  Oh, I'm sure it does happen, wait until someone crashes or someone dies because they couldn't get mom to a hospital, see how negligent homicide or reckless endangerment stacks up to an unlawful repo or bill collection tactic. 

I also doubt any court would find you negligent as a property owner for any incident with a police dog under the control of the handler, and the handler is always controlling the animal, even if he leaves the dog inside and runs to the store. :) 

We're also planning on electing sewage backup coverage at $2,500.We've also been told that tenants should be required to purchase renter's insurance, because any damage to the property caused by their negligence would not be covered under our policy.

That's really the question.If the buyer does have a system for inspection, title research or other due diligence and leaves this up to wholesaler/intermediary, then you ought yo oasis until you are comfortable with putting am process in place.The wholesaler is negligent in being clear, IMHO.

In fact, I'd argue if it wasn't for certain hard to fill jobs receiving outsize increases in wages that overall wage growth would be negligible if not going down. 

Placing a tenant buyer at a disadvantage, intentionally or negligently can lead to trouble.

I suggest tons of insurance and good property management, if you aren't negligent you don't have an issue. :) 

Fact is, most of these statements are patently false and many studies after the fact have shown that at BEST paying for these stadiums with public money has negligible to no benefit and at worst is a colossal waste of money.For example, the city of St.

I am a little late to this discussion but one possible counter to the personal guarantee would be to provide a personal guarantee for certain carve-outs such as fraud, negligence, etc.